[Python-3000] threading, part 2
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
qrczak at knm.org.pl
Fri Aug 11 19:00:07 CEST 2006
Josiah Carlson <jcarlson at uci.edu> writes:
> There is already a way of making Python source execution atomic with
> respect to other Python code .
It's not realistic to expect sys.setcheckinterval be implementable on
Also, it doesn't provide a way to unblock asynchronous exceptions until
a particular blocking operation completes.
> If you don't want random exceptions being raised in your threads, then
> don't use this method that is capable of raising exceptions somewhat
It's like saying "if you don't want integer addition overflow, then
don't do addition".
I do want asynchronous exceptions, but not anywhere, only in selected
regions (or excluding selected regions). This can be designed well.
__("< Marcin Kowalczyk
\__/ qrczak at knm.org.pl
More information about the Python-3000