[Python-3000] Draft pre-PEP: function annotations
Nick Coghlan
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Mon Aug 14 03:40:43 CEST 2006
Paul Prescod wrote:
> If we get past the meta-discussion, I don't really see any disagreement
> left. I'll grit my teeth and avoid commenting on the meta-discussion. ;)
Ah, so I'm not the only one doing that then };>
> My proposed text for the PEP is as follows:
Generally +1, except for this bit:
> "In Python 3000, semantics will be attached to the following types:
> objects of type string (or subtype of string) are to be used for
> documentation (though they are not necessarily the exclusive source of
> documentation about the type). Objects of type list (or subtype of list)
> are to be used for attaching multiple independent annotations."
Interpretations of string & list subtypes should be up to whoever creates
those subtypes - it's only the builtins themselves that python-dev should be
the authority for.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
More information about the Python-3000
mailing list