[Python-3000] Fwd: Conventions for annotation consumers

[Collin Winter]

On 8/15/06, Phillip J. Eby <pje at telecommunity.com> wrote:
> Personally, I thought Guido's original proposal for function annotations,
> which included a __typecheck__ operator that was replaceable on a
> per-module basis (and defaulted to a no-op), was the perfect thing --
> neither too much semantics nor too-little.  I'd like to have it back,
> please.  :)

I'd be perfectly happy to go back to talking about "type annotations",
rather than the more general "function annotations", especially since
most of the discussion thus far has been about how to multiple things
with annotations at the same time. Restricting annotations to type
information would be fine by me.

Collin Winter