[Python-3000] [Python-Dev] Python 3000 Process

[Anthony Baxter]

On Wednesday 22 March 2006 16:19, Neil Schemenauer wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 09:08:04PM -0800, Neal Norwitz wrote:
> > I wonder if we should call the 3.x series as 2.99.x for the
> > "pre-releases".  That would give us 99 tries to get it write,
> > plus we have an asymptote for 2.x. :-)
>
> I'd rather see 3.0alphaX.  Personally I think 2.x should go on
> as long as someone is interested in doing the releases (similar to
> Linux 2.0.x, 2.2.x, and 2.4.x).  I guess the chances of making it
> to 2.99 is very slim.

I could see some bugfix releases of the last 2.x continuing for some 
time, but I doubt we have the resources to put into feature releases 
of both 2.x and 3.x for an extended period of time. 

Anthony
-- 
Anthony Baxter     <anthony at interlink.com.au>
It's never too late to have a happy childhood.