[Python-3000] sets in P3K?

[Terry Reedy]

"Nick Coghlan" <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:44572190.30007 at gmail.com...
> If you went for a syntactic notation for the empty set, I'd want to use 
> {} and
> make the empty dict {:}, by that idea didn't even make your list of
> alternatives :)

Those are my favorites also.  The 2.x -> 3.0 edit of {} to {:} is trivial 
for an auto-correct function.

tjr