[Python-3000] sets in P3K?
Raymond Hettinger
rhettinger at ewtllc.com
Tue May 2 21:05:06 CEST 2006
>That doesn't fix everybody's brain though. Given that sets are much
>less universally useful than dicts I don't think that dict should
>"give in".
>
>
>
>
Right. Changes to the {} notation for empty dicts should be off the
table lest we have a lifetime of regrets. Set literals are not worth
committing atrocities elsewhere in the language.
I think Guido had the best solution. Use set() for empty sets, use {}
for empty dicts, use {genexp} for set comprehensions/displays, use
{1,2,3} for explicit set literals, and use {k1:v1, k2:v2} for dict
literals. We can always add {/} later if demand exceeds distaste.
Also, FWIW, I think the current dict constructor is fine as-is. No
doubt that its API is fully-loaded, but it is very useful and not hard
to learn. Practicality wins here.
Raymond
More information about the Python-3000
mailing list