[Python-3000] i guess i was misunderstood

[Guido van Rossum]

[Guido]
> > You seem to be still under the influence of the type-safety mafia, who
> > want to make you believe that with enough type-checking you can
> > prevent all bugs (though they don't believe it themselves).

[Talin, quoetd by Guido]
> >> I think that I agree with the gist of Tomer's point.

[Guido responds]
> >Well, to most of us it's far from clear what he's trying to say...

[Tomer]
> no, i'm quite the opposite in fact. i want a type-less language. sure,
> builtin types like int/str/float need some concrete distinction, but apart
> from those, all language-level objects should be typeless.

Well, sorry, but I don't think anyone here understands what you mean
by "typeless" so I think continuing this discussion is rather
pointless. Your statement that "an object's type is its MRO" is also
meaningless and not rooted in fact. And your examples are
incomprehensible.

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)