[Python-3000] stdlib reorganization

[Josiah Carlson]

"Steven Bethard" <steven.bethard at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 5/30/06, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
> > So, first step in my mind is settling if we want to add one more depth to
> > the stdlib, and if so, how we want to group (not specific groupings, just
> > general guidelines).
> 
> I think that having a package level that exactly matches the divisions
> in the Library Reference (http://docs.python.org/lib/lib.html) would
> be great.  Currently, that would mean packages for:

Agreed.

Though I'm probably a bit strange in that I almost want a top level "py"
package, and a separating of site-packages from the sys.path and into a
top level package named "site".

The former would make clear that you expect the module to be in the
standard library, and the latter would make clear that you want a
site-packages-specific module/package.

 - Josiah