[Python-3000] Draft PEP for outer scopes

[Ka-Ping Yee]

On Fri, 3 Nov 2006, Neil Toronto wrote:
> Is there any particular reason this *must* be a Py3k PEP? (Aside from
> the fact that we're discussing it on the Py3k list, of course.) Some of
> the solutions discussed for historical context would *definitely* be bad
> ideas for a 2.x (as would changing the semantics of 'global'), but I
> can't see why the solution proposed in the PEP couldn't be done sooner.

Well, i guess that's true.  It doesn't seem out of the question for 2.x.


-- ?!ng