[Python-3000] Python-3000 Digest, Vol 9, Issue 27
Nick Coghlan
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Tue Nov 14 17:01:51 CET 2006
George Sakkis wrote:
> On 11/14/06, Fredrik Lundh <fredrik at pythonware.com> wrote:
>
>> BJ?rn Lindqvist wrote:
>>
>>> But why is both the dict and list protocol so fat then? Is it hard to
>>> create your own dict or list-derived types in Python?
>> don't confuse things like lists and dictionaries with things like
>> sequences and mappings. iterators and iterables belong to the second
>> category.
>
> This doesn't answer my last question: why do we need itertools when we
> can live without sequencetools, mappingtools, fileliketools, etc. ?
Because the iterator protocol is simple enough to be easily composable - there
are a wide variety of things that can be done with an object when all you know
about it is that it is some form of iterable. The more assumptions you have to
start making about the iterable, the less widely applicable the resulting
operation will be.
And I think the number one reason we don't see a compelling need for the extra
tool libraries you describe is the fact that sequences, mappings and files are
themselves all iterables.
That said, there are actually a number of modules for working with sequences
in the standard library, like bisect and heapq. They just aren't lumped into
one place the way itertools and functools are.
Having a rich method API vs having a narrow method API and duck-typed support
functions is a design trade-off. In the case of sequences and mappings, the
trade-off went towards a richer API because the de facto reference
implementations were the builtin dict and list classes (which is why DictMixin
and ListMixin are so useful when implementing your own containers). In the
case of iterables and iterators, the trade-off went towards the narrow API so
that the interface could be used in a wide variety of situations (lines in a
file, records in a database, characters in a string, bytes from a serial port,
frames in a bowling game, active players in a MMORPG, etc, etc, etc).
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
More information about the Python-3000
mailing list