[Python-3000] Empty set and empty dictionary

[Eoghan Murray]

s[1] being a list index of the list 's'
s[1,] being a set literal with one element, '1'

On 17/04/07, Eoghan Murray <eoghan at qatano.com> wrote:
>
> I had another idea on this theme.. going by unicode and raw string
> literals, how about
> s[1, 2, 3, 4]
> for a set?
>
> Eoghan
>
> On 17/04/07, Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
> >
> > DillonCo wrote:
> >
> > > Why not use "<>" for sets?
> >
> > Some possible reasons:
> >
> > * It would look ugly
> >
> > * There could be visual confusion with comparison operators
> >
> > * There could be parsing difficulties distinguishing
> >    nested set bracketing from << and >> operators
> >
> > --
> > Greg
> > _______________________________________________
> > Python-3000 mailing list
> > Python-3000 at python.org
> > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
> > Unsubscribe:
> > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/eoghan%40qatano.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> http://qatano.com/
> http://eoghan.qatano.org/
> +353 86 236 1190




-- 
http://qatano.com/
http://eoghan.qatano.org/
+353 86 236 1190
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000/attachments/20070417/4b9dc874/attachment.htm