[Python-3000] Fixing super anyone?
rhamph at gmail.com
Tue Apr 24 00:21:43 CEST 2007
On 4/23/07, Phillip J. Eby <pje at telecommunity.com> wrote:
> But I can't say I particularly like this idea, compared to "super.foo" or
> even "super(self).foo". In fact, the latter invocation doesn't even
> require a keyword -- it just means the compiler needs to include a cell
> variable for the current class whenever it thinks you might be using super().
+1 on super(self).foo. It's SomeLongClassName we want to get rid of, not self.
As a bonus, super() and super(cls) have obvious semantics.
Adam Olsen, aka Rhamphoryncus
More information about the Python-3000