[Python-3000] PEP 30XZ: Simplified Parsing
Guido van Rossum
guido at python.org
Mon Apr 30 19:30:28 CEST 2007
On 4/30/07, Giovanni Bajo <rasky at develer.com> wrote:
> I was in favor of one of the alternatives that were proposed here:
Was? Are you no longer in favor of it? (Then I should shut up. :-)
> line continuation through indentation:
>
> a = 123 *
> (12 + 4) / 8
>
> assert True,
> "No goofy paren" +
> ", dude"
>
> ... and don't tell me that you need a character there because using just
> indentation is hard to read :)
>
> Even if you don't want to champion this solution in your PEP, you should at
> least list it among the alternatives.
Then please add my -1 to it: I don't think this is feasible. It would
require allowing matching INDENT and DEDENT tokens *anywhere* in the
grammar; *or* you would have to limit where in the grammar you allow
the indent to occur (e.g. after '*' but not before it; after the ','
but not before it). It seems a really big departure from the current
Python parsing methodology.
--
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
More information about the Python-3000
mailing list