[Python-3000] [Python-Dev] Need help fixing failing Py3k Unittests in py3k-struni

Christian Heimes lists at cheimes.de
Wed Jul 11 01:17:26 CEST 2007


Steven Bethard wrote:
> I'd probably go with something a little more restrictive, maybe:
> 
>     r'self.assert_\(\S+ == \S+\)'
> 
> Something like that ought to have fewer false positives.

Woops! You are right. Even your pattern has caused some false positives
but I've reread the patch and removed the offending lines. I'm going to
upload another patch as soon as I have verified mine again.

Christian



More information about the Python-3000 mailing list