[Python-3000] [Python-Dev] Need help fixing failing Py3k Unittests in py3k-struni
Christian Heimes
lists at cheimes.de
Wed Jul 11 01:17:26 CEST 2007
Steven Bethard wrote:
> I'd probably go with something a little more restrictive, maybe:
>
> r'self.assert_\(\S+ == \S+\)'
>
> Something like that ought to have fewer false positives.
Woops! You are right. Even your pattern has caused some false positives
but I've reread the patch and removed the offending lines. I'm going to
upload another patch as soon as I have verified mine again.
Christian
More information about the Python-3000
mailing list