[Python-3000] Renumbering old PEPs now targeted for Py3k?
Barry Warsaw
barry at python.org
Thu Jun 7 13:45:45 CEST 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Jun 6, 2007, at 9:21 PM, Chris Monson wrote:
> Renumbering, +1; using the next 31xx number, +1.
>
> Renumbering +1
> Leaving (old PEP number) in place as a stripped down PEP that just
> points to the new number: +1
I don't want to (accidentally) re-use the old number for some other
PEP, and PEPs are intended to be the historical record of a feature,
so my own preferences would be:
- - Leave the old PEP in place, with a pointer to the renumbered PEP
- - Renumber the PEP by putting a '3' in front of it instead of using
the next available
We don't have a template for renumbered PEPs so just come up with
something reasonable that fits the flavor of PEPs. If we need to
generalize later, we can.
- -Barry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
iQCVAwUBRmfv6nEjvBPtnXfVAQL1yAP9FOGBU5TMa4HUiP8IRoqS/wemFOdotHwf
GwvNPIEthJXheUBS/lOWLpSCERUzToSfqWzUJWkOUk5JfxsDP6MgWKwfkOwhvp35
oihXrkWoc/XtK2qJipLXVWLhg/5CkPuvnjXSrVMzqpu5J26YPV/QIb2Xa0ICF90e
c2mQY0cuzWM=
=HMOs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Python-3000
mailing list