[Python-3000] Renumbering old PEPs now targeted for Py3k?

[Guido van Rossum]

On 6/7/07, Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> wrote:
> Nick Coghlan schrieb:
> > Guido van Rossum wrote:
> >> A few PEPs with numbers < 400 are now targeting Python 3000, e.g. PEP
> >> 367 (new super) and PEP 344 (exception chaining). Are there any
> >> others? I propose that we renumber these to numbers in the 3100+
> >> range. I can see two forms of renaming:
> >>
> >> (a) 344 -> 3344 and 367 -> 3367, i.e. add 3000 to the number
> >>
> >> (b) just use the next available number
> >>
> >> Preferences?
> >>
> >> What other PEPs should be renumbered?
> >>
> >> Should we renumber at all?
> >>
> >
> > +1 for renumbering to the next available 31xx number, with the old
> > number kept as a pointer to the new one.
>
> That would be my vote too.

And so it is done. 344 -> 3134, 367 -> 3135. I've left the old ones in
place with status "Replaced" and a "Numbering Note" in front of the
abstract.

Are there any other candidates for such a renumbering?

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)