[Python-3000] Discussions with no PEPs
Thomas Wouters
thomas at python.org
Thu Mar 8 19:04:29 CET 2007
On 3/8/07, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 8, 2007, at 12:15 PM, Jim Jewett wrote:
> [Guido]
> >> -- Generic Functions
> >> -- Interfaces
> >
> > These two were heavily tied to annotations; one option would have been
> > to introduce them at the same time as an example use.
> >
> > Given that annotations do not require them, another option is to wait
> > (at least) an extra release, while annotations sink in.
> >
> > Since they can be done as 3rd-party libraries, I assumed the decision
> > was to postpone at least until there was a concrete implementation
> > candidate available. (And no, I don't know exactly what "candidate
> > available" would require.)
>
> We already have an established, community accepted implementation of
> interfaces, so why not just accept that into the core stdlib?
Guido already knows this, but I would like to second Barry's excellent idea.
--
Thomas Wouters <thomas at python.org>
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me
spread!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000/attachments/20070308/42900150/attachment.htm
More information about the Python-3000
mailing list