[Python-3000] PEP Parade

Tim Delaney tcdelaney at optusnet.com.au
Tue May 1 22:51:35 CEST 2007

From: "Jim Jewett" <jimjjewett at gmail.com>

> On 5/1/07, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
>> So the PEP submissions are in, and a few late ones will be submitted
>> ASAP. Let me write up a capsule review of what we've got. Please let
>> me know if I missed anything (e.g. a PEP that someone has committed to
>> write but hasn't submitted yet).
> (1)  The __this_*__ PEP was written and posted; I'll revise it slightly 
> tonight.
> One benefit would be a minimal-change version of super.

I intend for the 'super' PEP to not rely on this in any way, but will add a 
note that your PEP (and other changes) may make the implementation simpler, 
and so the implementation should be revisited before 3.0.

The semantics of 'super' OTOH should be fully clarified in our PEP.

Tim Delaney 

More information about the Python-3000 mailing list