[Python-3000] [Python-Dev] PEP 30XZ: Simplified Parsing
steven.bethard at gmail.com
Wed May 2 20:45:38 CEST 2007
On 5/2/07, Brian Harring <ferringb at gmail.com> wrote:
> Personally, I'm -1 on nuking implicit string concatenation; the
> examples provided for the 'why' aren't that strong in my experience,
> and the forced shift to concattenation is rather annoying when you're
> dealing with code limits (80 char limit for example)-
> dprint("depends level cycle: %s: "
> "dropping cycle for %s from %s" %
> (cur_frame.atom, datom,
FWLIW, I pretty much always write this as::
msg = "depends level cycle: %s: dropping cycle for %s from %s"
tup = cur_frame.atom, datom, cur_frame.current_pkg, "cycle"
dprint(msg % tup)
But yes, occasionally I run into problems when the string still
doesn't fit on a single line. (Of course, I usually solve that by
shortening the string...) ;-)
I'm not *in*-sane. Indeed, I am so far *out* of sane that you appear a
tiny blip on the distant coast of sanity.
--- Bucky Katt, Get Fuzzy
More information about the Python-3000