[Python-3000] PEP 3131 - the details

Greg Ewing greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Fri May 18 03:21:17 CEST 2007

Martin v. Löwis wrote:

> (there might be a need for it in RTL languages, supporting
> 200E..200F and 202A..202E, but it seems that speakers of RTL
> languages are skeptical about the entire PEP, so it's unclear
> whether allowing these would help anything)

The ideal kind of programming language for use by both
LTR and RTL people would be some kind of RPN. Then the
whole program could be read either way as either prefix
or postfix. :-)


More information about the Python-3000 mailing list