[Python-3000] [Python-Dev] PEP 367: New Super
timothy.c.delaney at gmail.com
Sun May 27 13:09:22 CEST 2007
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> The bound method object isn't stored in the class -- it's created by
> the "C.method" or "inst.method" getattr operation. I don't see how
> this would introduce a cycle.
>> If we store the class, we can store it as a weakref - the when the
>> super object is created, a strong reference to the class exists.
We need to create some relationship between the unbound method and the
class. So the class has a reference to the unbound method, and the unbound
method has a reference to the class, thus creating a cycle. Bound methods
don't come into it - it's the unbound method that's the problem.
> Since class and type are synonym (as you say) having both im_class and
> im_type would be a bad idea.
I'm struggling to think of another, not too complicated name that conveys
the same information.
More information about the Python-3000