[Python-3000] Performance Notes
Thomas Hunger
hto at arcor.de
Tue Sep 4 18:49:48 CEST 2007
> I've been doing some profiling of 3.0 vs. 2.6 release builds on
> Windows XP for the purpose of hopefully closing the performance
> gap. This data is very preliminary, but I thought I'd throw it out
> here in case someone else also wanted to look into this. Also,
> possibly useful for comparing against profiling data on other
> platforms. The table below just lists functions and speed
> differentials in 3.0 vs. 2.6, ordered by the functions in which we
> spend the most total time.
Hello,
I don't know much about python internals, so the following might be
bogus:
I replaced unicode_hash and string_hash with the hash function from
here: http://www.azillionmonkeys.com/qed/hash.html.
Then I ran the following micro-benchmark :
$ time ./python bench.py
where bech.py is:
f = dict((line, nr) for nr, line
in enumerate(open('/usr/share/dict/words',
encoding='latin1').readlines()))
Python3k original hash: real 0m2.210s
new hash: real 0m1.842s
So maybe this is an interesting hash function?
Tom
More information about the Python-3000
mailing list