[Python-3000] Int and Long unification (was Re: Help replacing Py_FindMethod)

[Jesus Cea]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jesus Cea wrote:
| Good night everybody!.
|
| Working on the Python3.0 support for bsddb I see that "Py_FindMethod"
| was just removed in Python last beta.

Nevermind. I just reviewed the recent changes in the SVN and I can see
your patches for bsddb. Changes "ported" to my tree :-).

Now I see another issue: I just changed "PyInt_*" in my code to
"PyLong_*" (since PyInt_* functions don't exist in Python 3.0). But
since an integer fails "PyLong_Check()" in Python 2.*, how can I check
for integers portably between Python 2.[3-6] and Python 3.0?. I would
like to avoid conditional compilation, if possible.

I'm thinking about defining macros "NUMBER_*" to be defined as "PyInt_*"
in Python 2.* and "PyLong_*" in Python 3.0, but I guess must exist a
better approach. Ideas?.

Thanks for your time and attention.

- --
Jesus Cea Avion                         _/_/      _/_/_/        _/_/_/
jcea at jcea.es - http://www.jcea.es/     _/_/    _/_/  _/_/    _/_/  _/_/
jabber / xmpp:jcea at jabber.org         _/_/    _/_/          _/_/_/_/_/
.                              _/_/  _/_/    _/_/          _/_/  _/_/
"Things are not so easy"      _/_/  _/_/    _/_/  _/_/    _/_/  _/_/
"My name is Dump, Core Dump"   _/_/_/        _/_/_/      _/_/  _/_/
"El amor es poner tu felicidad en la felicidad de otro" - Leibniz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQCVAwUBSIF+CZlgi5GaxT1NAQLAxQP/ahlDSx2MsHMvcTnVbhBom4ulT0XdIIKu
kGNPi1il0orF6udom3Y3eGxbdVqwetvGRMrkn56US7wWFUIkNllFbdvk+ILc9neP
HudrLl2QNt+TIaEU/e0KztfJEU4ilaxZ20T0VVFaJsUALEZ1ovxMWKkwzo/CVHfN
EZ5ljqBQ0hY=
=8TJz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----