[Python-3000] [Python-3000-checkins] r61682 - in python/branches/py3k: Include/code.h Include/compile.h Lib/__future__.py Lib/test/test_print.py Python/future.c
Guido van Rossum
guido at python.org
Fri Mar 21 02:29:41 CET 2008
Cool, I can live with that. Are all current __future__ statements
still valid in 3.0?
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Eric Smith
<eric+python-dev at trueblade.com> wrote:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > Really? I though 2to3 was supposed to remove all __future__ imports?
>
> I was convinced when Christian pointed out the statement in
> http://docs.python.org/lib/module-future.html:
> "No feature description will ever be deleted from __future__."
>
> Admittedly, I implemented more than the minimum required for that, but
> since the other future statements (absolute_import, with_statement,
> etc.) were in py3k, I figured it would make sense to have print_function
> behave the same way. Then, if we want to remove all __future__ imports
> from py3k, it's more obvious (to me, anyway) how to extract them all.
>
>
>
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 4:02 PM, eric.smith
> > <python-3000-checkins at python.org> wrote:
> >> Author: eric.smith
> >> Date: Fri Mar 21 00:02:08 2008
> >> New Revision: 61682
> >>
> >> Modified:
> >> python/branches/py3k/Include/code.h
> >> python/branches/py3k/Include/compile.h
> >> python/branches/py3k/Lib/__future__.py
> >> python/branches/py3k/Lib/test/test_print.py
> >> python/branches/py3k/Python/future.c
> >> Log:
> >> Add __future__ import for print_function. It's a no-op in 3.0, but it needs to not be a syntax error.
> >> Closes issue 2436.
> >>
> >> Modified: python/branches/py3k/Include/code.h
> >> ==============================================================================
> >> --- python/branches/py3k/Include/code.h (original)
> >> +++ python/branches/py3k/Include/code.h Fri Mar 21 00:02:08 2008
> >> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
> >> #define CO_FUTURE_DIVISION 0x2000
> >> #define CO_FUTURE_ABSOLUTE_IMPORT 0x4000 /* do absolute imports by default */
> >> #define CO_FUTURE_WITH_STATEMENT 0x8000
> >> +#define CO_FUTURE_PRINT_FUNCTION 0x10000
> >> #endif
> >>
> >> /* This should be defined if a future statement modifies the syntax.
> >>
> >> Modified: python/branches/py3k/Include/compile.h
> >> ==============================================================================
> >> --- python/branches/py3k/Include/compile.h (original)
> >> +++ python/branches/py3k/Include/compile.h Fri Mar 21 00:02:08 2008
> >> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
> >> #define FUTURE_DIVISION "division"
> >> #define FUTURE_ABSOLUTE_IMPORT "absolute_import"
> >> #define FUTURE_WITH_STATEMENT "with_statement"
> >> +#define FUTURE_PRINT_FUNCTION "print_function"
> >>
> >> struct _mod; /* Declare the existence of this type */
> >> PyAPI_FUNC(PyCodeObject *) PyAST_Compile(struct _mod *, const char *,
> >>
> >> Modified: python/branches/py3k/Lib/__future__.py
> >> ==============================================================================
> >> --- python/branches/py3k/Lib/__future__.py (original)
> >> +++ python/branches/py3k/Lib/__future__.py Fri Mar 21 00:02:08 2008
> >> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
> >> "division",
> >> "absolute_import",
> >> "with_statement",
> >> + "print_function",
> >> ]
> >>
> >> __all__ = ["all_feature_names"] + all_feature_names
> >> @@ -66,6 +67,7 @@
> >> CO_FUTURE_DIVISION = 0x2000 # division
> >> CO_FUTURE_ABSOLUTE_IMPORT = 0x4000 # perform absolute imports by default
> >> CO_FUTURE_WITH_STATEMENT = 0x8000 # with statement
> >> +CO_FUTURE_PRINT_FUNCTION = 0x10000 # print function
> >>
> >> class _Feature:
> >> def __init__(self, optionalRelease, mandatoryRelease, compiler_flag):
> >> @@ -114,3 +116,7 @@
> >> with_statement = _Feature((2, 5, 0, "alpha", 1),
> >> (2, 6, 0, "alpha", 0),
> >> CO_FUTURE_WITH_STATEMENT)
> >> +
> >> +print_function = _Feature((2, 6, 0, "alpha", 2),
> >> + (3, 0, 0, "alpha", 0),
> >> + CO_FUTURE_PRINT_FUNCTION)
> >>
> >> Modified: python/branches/py3k/Lib/test/test_print.py
> >> ==============================================================================
> >> --- python/branches/py3k/Lib/test/test_print.py (original)
> >> +++ python/branches/py3k/Lib/test/test_print.py Fri Mar 21 00:02:08 2008
> >> @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
> >> """Test correct operation of the print function.
> >> """
> >>
> >> +from __future__ import print_function
> >> +
> >> import unittest
> >> from test import test_support
> >>
> >> @@ -98,6 +100,11 @@
> >> x('*\n', (ClassWith__str__('*'),))
> >> x('abc 1\n', (ClassWith__str__('abc'), 1))
> >>
> >> +# # 2.x unicode tests
> >> +# x(u'1 2\n', ('1', u'2'))
> >> +# x(u'u\1234\n', (u'u\1234',))
> >> +# x(u' abc 1\n', (' ', ClassWith__str__(u'abc'), 1))
> >> +
> >> # errors
> >> self.assertRaises(TypeError, print, '', sep=3)
> >> self.assertRaises(TypeError, print, '', end=3)
> >>
> >> Modified: python/branches/py3k/Python/future.c
> >> ==============================================================================
> >> --- python/branches/py3k/Python/future.c (original)
> >> +++ python/branches/py3k/Python/future.c Fri Mar 21 00:02:08 2008
> >> @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@
> >> continue;
> >> } else if (strcmp(feature, FUTURE_WITH_STATEMENT) == 0) {
> >> continue;
> >> + } else if (strcmp(feature, FUTURE_PRINT_FUNCTION) == 0) {
> >> + continue;
> >> } else if (strcmp(feature, "braces") == 0) {
> >> PyErr_SetString(PyExc_SyntaxError,
> >> "not a chance");
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Python-3000-checkins mailing list
> >> Python-3000-checkins at python.org
> >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000-checkins
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
--
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
More information about the Python-3000
mailing list