[Python-3000] PEP 3138- String representation in Python 3000

Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Fri May 9 18:06:59 CEST 2008


On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 3:54 AM, M.-A. Lemburg <mal at egenix.com> wrote:
> On 2008-05-08 22:55, Terry Reedy wrote:
>>
>> Functions that map unicode->unicode or bytes->bytes could be called
>> transcoders.  Each type could be given a .transcode method to go along with
>> but contrast with .encode or .decode.
>
> Are you suggesting to have two separate methods which then
> allow same-type-conversions ? One for encoding to the same
> type and one for decoding ?
>
> Fine with me.
>
> They do have to map naturally to the codec method encode and
> decode, though, so a single method won't do, unless maybe
> you add a parameter to define the direction of the coding
> process.
>
> In summary, I'd just like to see the following happen:
>
>  * revert the type restrictions on the PyCodec_* API
>
>  * enforce the restrictions on the .encode() and .decode()
>   methods of PyUnicode and PyString objects (str and bytes)
>
>  * add a way to PyUnicode and PyString objects (str and bytes)
>   to allow same type encoding and decoding

+1

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)


More information about the Python-3000 mailing list