[Python-3000] None in Comparisons
Terry Reedy
tjreedy at udel.edu
Tue Nov 11 18:58:37 CET 2008
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> Why was the special case for None being "smaller" than all other
> objects in Python removed from Python 3.0 ? (see object.c in Py2.x)
For one thing, it is only smallest when it controls the comparison.
>>> class c(object):
... def __lt__(s,o): return True
...
>>> cc = c()
>>> cc < None
True
Of course,
>>> None < cc
True
Which means that both [cc, None] and [None, cc] are sorted (assuming it
only uses < comparison).
Terry Jan Reedy
More information about the Python-3000
mailing list