[Python-3000] [Python-Dev] New proposition for Python3 bytes filename issue
Bill Janssen
janssen at parc.com
Wed Oct 1 19:14:00 CEST 2008
glyph at divmod.com wrote:
> > I'm actually sort of liking this idea. A Pathname class, for
> > convenience
> > a subtype of String, but containing the underlying binary
> > representation
> >used by the OS. Even non-unicode pathnames could be represented.
>
> On the one hand, I agree with you - except for the part where it's a
> subtype of String, that doesn't work. In case I haven't mentioned it
> enough times already:
>
> http://twistedmatrix.com/documents/8.1.0/api/twisted.python.filepath.FilePath.html
>
> On the other hand, we've all been on this merry-go-round before:
>
> http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0355/
>
> Note especially the rejection notice: "Subclassing from str is a
> particularly bad idea".
Yes, the only real justification for it is to not break existing code
(otherwise, calling str() is not that much of an ordeal).
> On the other hand, we've all been on this merry-go-round before:
>
> http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0355/
The very existence of os.path seems a good argument that something like
this is useful. Perhaps PEP 355 just went too far.
Bill
More information about the Python-3000
mailing list