[Python-3000] Proposed revised schedule

[Barry Warsaw]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sep 8, 2008, at 7:25 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:

> Well, from the number of release blockers it sounds like another 3.0
> beta is the right thing. For 2.6 however I believe we're much closer
> to the finish line -- there aren't all those bytes/str issues to clean
> up, for example! And apparently the benefit of releasing on schedule
> is that we will be included in OSX. That's a much bigger deal for 2.6
> than for 3.0 (I doubt that Apple would add two versions anyway).

The MajorOS Vendor (tm) may be willing to ship a 3.0 beta if it's far  
enough along, though not as the primary Python version.  They clearly  
want 2.6 for that.

- -Barry

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)

iQCVAwUBSMZ4cXEjvBPtnXfVAQL4ygP/fLILvf3NhvmN3R2T7htGm08xt/bOBYGt
+BDrV4rapS4j3jo2Cx+McEdjJZCdq9x7BIaTN+4ITwq02LEY5fmhp6NkhzE1dlnq
qdgBq8x/Z4AnsxfydtqYrPhrzLWPpdEZElgll5FB6Dj6XIA7cB8tuds2cE7+OXJI
Guom1Y0k6Ao=
=u4FB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----