<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 11/19/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Georg Brandl</b> <<a href="mailto:email@example.com">firstname.lastname@example.org</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Guido van Rossum wrote:<br><br>> PEPs aren't only for difficult discussions. :-) They are also there<br>> for reference and to record agreement. Referring to an email isn't<br>> really a very good answer when someone asks (as happened here) "what
<br>> is the spec"? A PEP may also discourage attempts to add more cruft,<br>> and encourage someone with a few spare cycles to provide a patch so we<br>> can put the whole thing behind it.<br>><br>> BTW I forgot to mention that it shouldn't return anything.
<br>><br>> (So are you going to write that PEP? :-)<br><br>It's in Subversion and numbered 3105, should be online with the next<br>website update cycle.</blockquote><div><br>The only thing I would prefer is instead of 'end' have 'newline' and have that be a boolean since I don't see a need to support different line endings. I realize the difference between ``end=''`` and ``newline=False`` is minimal beyond more typing, but for some reason my head just keeps telling me I prefer the latter for clarity reasons.
<br><br>Otherwise +1 from me.<br><br>-Brett</div></div>