<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Greg Ewing <<a href="mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org">email@example.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Thomas Wouters wrote:<br>
> [Guido] asked for 'f(*a, b, c)' to be valid, but it only makes sense<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d">> to allow, say, 'f(*a, b, *c)' too, and he hasn't said 'no' to that.<br>
</div>And then, of course, people are going to want<br>
to have multiple ** arguments, too...<br>
</blockquote><div><br>Of course. Anything worth doing is worth doing right. The grammar changes are done (and it turns out much simpler without these restrictions), if it weren't for this horrible cold I would have a patch for it up already.<br>
</div></div><br>-- <br>Thomas Wouters <<a href="mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org">email@example.com</a>><br><br>Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!