[Python-bugs-list] [ python-Bugs-417634 ] configuring without C++ compiler name
noreply@sourceforge.net
noreply@sourceforge.net
Thu, 06 Dec 2001 11:38:18 -0800
Bugs item #417634, was opened at 2001-04-20 07:20
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=417634&group_id=5470
Category: Build
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
>Assigned to: Michael Hudson (mwh)
Summary: configuring without C++ compiler name
Initial Comment:
If you check out a clean copy of Python 2.1 on a
Solaris 5.8 machine, and run:
./configure -with-cxx
rather than:
./configure -with-cxx=g++
It generates a makefile with "CXX=yes", so "make"
produces:
bash-2.03$ make
yes -c -g -O2 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -I. \
-I./Include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H \
-o Modules/ccpython.o \
./Modules/ccpython.cc
make: yes: Command not found
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Guido van Rossum (gvanrossum)
Date: 2001-12-06 11:38
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=6380
Where's the attached fix? Back to MWH.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Michael Hudson (mwh)
Date: 2001-12-06 09:31
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=6656
Two options: (1) apply the braindead fix I've just attached
(2) ignore the problem and close the report.
I don't really have an opinion on which is better.
An autoconf guru may have a better idea, but it hardly seems
worth putting too much effort into. Assigned to Guido for a
quick decision -- please don't think too hard about it!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=417634&group_id=5470