[Python-bugs-list] [ python-Bugs-419462 ] python 2.0 compile fails on mandrake 8

[noreply@sourceforge.net]

Bugs item #419462, was opened at 2001-04-27 05:08
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=419462&group_id=5470

Category: Build
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton (lkcl)
Assigned to: A.M. Kuchling (akuchling)
Summary: python 2.0 compile fails on mandrake 8

Initial Comment:
bddbmodule fails to compile on mandrake 8.

if bdb is not a mandatory module, autoconf should be
used to
detect that bdb is or is not installed.  [it's looking
for
R_NEXT etc. which don't exist]

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: A.M. Kuchling (akuchling)
Date: 2001-07-14 14:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=11375

Autoconf no longer mucks around with BSDDB at all; it was 
ripped out for Python 2.1, so this bug can be closed, to 
be replaced by a multitude of setup.py bugs.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jeremy Hylton (jhylton)
Date: 2001-05-09 08:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31392

I wonder if the builtin bsddb module should be deprecated. 
The fact
that it gets built causes a fair bit of trouble for users of
bsddb3,
which I assume is the preferred interface.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton (lkcl)
Date: 2001-05-04 04:12

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=80200

update: there is an option in the Modules setup which can be
used to explicity disable bddb.  however, this, i feel,
should be totally unnecessary.

why exactly, is autoconf used, when it cannot be told -
correctly -
not to use bddb?  i attempted a compile with --without-bddb
(or
whatever it was), and it still failed.  because there just
_happens_
to be a db.h file _somewhere_ on the system, the configure
test "assumes" that there is a valid bddb somewhere, which
there isn't.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=419462&group_id=5470