[Python-bugs-list] [ python-Bugs-479981 ] socket failed then compiled with treads
noreply@sourceforge.net
noreply@sourceforge.net
Wed, 14 Nov 2001 06:43:16 -0800
Bugs item #479981, was opened at 2001-11-09 05:01
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=479981&group_id=5470
Category: Threads
Group: Python 2.1.1
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: socket failed then compiled with treads
Initial Comment:
Operating System HP-UX 11.0 (64 Bit)
I tried to compile Python 2.1.1 this thread support.
Doing so, the tests
test_socket and test_asynchat both failed
with "(9, 'Bad file number')"
The test_socket succeds if I compiled python without
threads, so I think it's an thread-problem.
The thread-test istself succeeds.
I think also, that python is correctly linked against
libpthread.
The same Problem occurs this Python 2.2.b1.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Martin v. Löwis (loewis)
Date: 2001-11-14 06:43
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=21627
Python puts a lock around gethostbyname if gethostbyname_r
is not available. I don't think that should cause a problem
even if gethostbyname is thread-safe. If you want to further
analyse this, you could try to put an && !defined(__hpux)
around the line
#define USE_GETHOSTBYNAME_LOCK
If you do, please report whether it works. In that case, it
would be good to know whether gethostbyname is thread-safe
on *all* HP-UX versions, or just on some.
Furthermore, since this wasn't reported before: Is it
specific to your installation, or reproducable on all
installations? Is it perhaps specific to 64-bit mode?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Date: 2001-11-12 02:12
Message:
Logged In: NO
Maybe the failure has to do with gethostbyname-stuff.
according the hpux-manpages theese reentrant interfaces are
obsolete:
int gethostent_r(struct hostent *result,
struct hostent_data *buffer);
int gethostbyname_r(const char *name,
struct hostent *result,
struct hostent_data *buffer);
int gethostbyaddr_r(const char *addr,
int len,
int type,
struct hostent *result,
struct hostent_data *buffer);
int sethostent_r(int stayopen, struct hostent_data
*buffer);
int endhostent_r(struct hostent_data *buffer);
The configure-script has correctly found, that there is only
a gethostbyname, but no gethostbyname_r.
according to the man-pages the call to gethostbyname IS
thread-save:
struct hostent *gethostent(void);
struct hostent *gethostbyname(const char *name);
struct hostent *gethostbyaddr(const char *addr,
int len,
int type);
...
MULTITHREAD USAGE
Thread Safe: Yes
Cancel Safe: Yes
Async-cancel Safe: No
Async-signal Safe: No
Is it a failure to expect the gethostbyname to be not
thread-save ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Date: 2001-11-12 01:29
Message:
Logged In: NO
the complete compiler line used to link together the python
binary:
gcc -Wl,-E -Wl,+s -Wl,+b/mosquito/python/lib/python2.1/lib-
dynload -o python \
Modules/python.o \
libpython2.1.a -lnsl -ldld -lpthread -lm
The compiler I used is gcc 3.01.
I tried it out with the cc from HP - the same effect
After installing the Kernelpatch PHKL_25475, wich supersedes
both PHKL_23842 and PHKL_20942 the failure remains the same
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Martin v. Löwis (loewis)
Date: 2001-11-09 16:13
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=21627
Can you please also check whether the patches PHKL_23842 (or
equivalent) and/or PHKL_20942.
The patch titles are
PHKL_23842 s700_800 11.00
signal,threads,spinlock,scheduler,IDS,q3p
PHKL_20942 s700_800 11.00
signal, nanosleep, spinlock, scheduler
It appears that HP-UX has a number of bugs where signals,
forking, and other aspects of the operating functionality
stop working in the presence of threads. If you don't have
these patches, it would be good if you could try to install
them, and report back whether it changes anything.
Notice that HP apparently has a number of patches with these
titles; they seem to be intended for different machines.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Martin v. Löwis (loewis)
Date: 2001-11-09 15:51
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=21627
What compiler are you using? Can you please report the
complete compiler line used to link together the python binary?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=479981&group_id=5470