[Python-bugs-list] [ python-Feature Requests-494034 ] a smarter rfc822.dump_address_pair()

noreply@sourceforge.net noreply@sourceforge.net
Thu, 07 Mar 2002 09:40:43 -0800


Feature Requests item #494034, was opened at 2001-12-16 18:24
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=355470&aid=494034&group_id=5470

Category: Python Library
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jason R. Mastaler (jasonrm)
Assigned to: Barry Warsaw (bwarsaw)
Summary: a smarter rfc822.dump_address_pair()

Initial Comment:
Please see:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2001-December/075881.html

I'm turning this into a feature request since
I didn't get any responses on comp.lang.python.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Jason R. Mastaler (jasonrm)
Date: 2002-03-07 10:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85984

I'd like to take a shot at coding a better
dump_address_pair method.  Before I start, should
the diff be against rfc822 or email.Utils? (which
currently just imports dump_address_pair from
rfc822).  Perhaps a new implementation like this
should just go into email, and
rfc822.dump_address_pair() can just be left as is,
similar to how the formatdate method was
reimplemented for email.

Let me know what you think.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Barry Warsaw (bwarsaw)
Date: 2001-12-17 15:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=12800

If you get to it before I do, upload it here... :)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jason R. Mastaler (jasonrm)
Date: 2001-12-17 15:28

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=85984

Thanks Barry.  If you don't think you'll have time to
write the code for this, I can try and work on a patch.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Barry Warsaw (bwarsaw)
Date: 2001-12-17 08:04

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=12800

Claiming this item.  There appears to be no groups set for
the feature request tracker, but I'll look at this for
Python 2.3 (to late to add it to Python 2.2).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=355470&aid=494034&group_id=5470