[Python-bugs-list] [ python-Bugs-535545 ] make fails at posixmodule.c

[noreply@sourceforge.net]

Bugs item #535545, was opened at 2002-03-26 21:26
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=535545&group_id=5470

Category: Build
Group: Python 2.2.1 candidate
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Whit Blauvelt (whit)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: make fails at posixmodule.c

Initial Comment:
gcc -DNDEBUG -g -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -I. 
-I./Include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H   -c 
./Modules/posixmodule.c -o Modules/posixmodule.o
./Modules/posixmodule.c: In function `posix_nice':
./Modules/posixmodule.c:1270: warning: implicit 
declaration of function `getpriority'
./Modules/posixmodule.c:1270: `PRIO_PROCESS' 
undeclared (first use in this function)
./Modules/posixmodule.c:1270: (Each undeclared 
identifier is reported only once
./Modules/posixmodule.c:1270: for each function it 
appears in.)
make: *** [Modules/posixmodule.o] Error 1

This using gcc version 2.95.3 on what started life as 
a Red Hat 6.0 system.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Whit Blauvelt (whit)
Date: 2002-03-27 19:35

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=133413

Attached is the end of the stderr output and 
posixmodule.i (combined in 1 file)



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martin v. Löwis (loewis)
Date: 2002-03-27 19:06

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=21627

I can't reproduce the problem on a similarly-configured machine.

Can you please add the options --trace-includes --save-temps
to the gcc command line? The first one will produce a lot of
output to stderr, the other will produce posixmodule.i.
Please attach both to the report.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Whit Blauvelt (whit)
Date: 2002-03-27 14:17

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=133413

I'm _not_ certain about header files. The fragments you 
ask about are there _except_ for 

#define PRIO_PROCESS PRIO_PROCESS

The file is attached. I don't need a fix at this point, 
but if it's worth fixing for others ... or knowing what to 
specify as the system requirement here....


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martin v. Löwis (loewis)
Date: 2002-03-27 11:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=21627

Are you sure you have installed the header files for this C
library as well? Can you please attach your copy or
/usr/include/bits/resource.h to this report? It should
contain the fragment

  PRIO_PROCESS = 0,             /* WHO is a process ID.  */
#define PRIO_PROCESS PRIO_PROCESS

Furthermore, /usr/include/sys/resource.h should contain the
fragment

/* Get the system-dependent definitions of structures and
bit values.  */
#include <bits/resource.h>

If you are not interested in investigating this further,
that would be fine as well.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Whit Blauvelt (whit)
Date: 2002-03-27 10:33

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=133413

glibc-2.1.3-15.i386.rpm
If by PRIO_ constants you mean shell variables(?), none.
Python configure reports "checking for getpriority  yes"

Each of the 2.x series fails to compile at that same point.
1.52 had no problem - and is all I actually needed at this
point.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martin v. Löwis (loewis)
Date: 2002-03-27 07:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=21627

What is the glibc release that you use? What PRIO_ constants
are defined on your system? Do you have the getpriority call?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=535545&group_id=5470