[Python-bugs-list] [ python-Bugs-618623 ] list(xrange(sys.maxint/4)) again

[noreply@sourceforge.net]

Bugs item #618623, was opened at 2002-10-04 18:02
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=618623&group_id=5470

Category: Python Interpreter Core
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Armin Rigo (arigo)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: list(xrange(sys.maxint/4)) again

Initial Comment:
SF bug #556025 triggers again in the latest 2.2 branch:

>>> list(xrange(sys.maxint/4))
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

on my Linux box.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Martin v. Löwis (loewis)
Date: 2002-10-05 23:07

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=21627

Good. I suggest we take no action for 2.2. For the other
bugs you found, would you like to propose a patch?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Armin Rigo (arigo)
Date: 2002-10-05 15:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=4771

Right, the bug doesn't show up on my SuSE 7 either, but only
on an old Mandrake box.  I found out that it is caused by a
bug in malloc().  Any malloc(n) with n greater than
(1<<31)-12 will pretend it succeeded, but actually only
allocate a few bytes, hence the immediately following
segmentation fault.  As it seems to be fixed in recent
versions of the libc I suggest to ignore this problem.

However, there are other overflow bugs in listobject.c which
are not malloc()'s fault.  Would you like me to go over the
whole code in detail and submit a patch?  Here are a couple
of examples:

>>> (sys.maxint/16+1) * range(16)
SystemError: Objects/listobject.c:63: bad argument to
internal function
>>> (sys.maxint/2+1) * range(16)
Segmentation fault (core dumped)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martin v. Löwis (loewis)
Date: 2002-10-05 11:57

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=21627

I can't reproduce this on SuSE 8.1. Can you analyse this in
more detail?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=618623&group_id=5470