[Python-bugs-list] [ python-Bugs-668433 ] Abort with "negative ref count"
SourceForge.net
noreply@sourceforge.net
Wed, 15 Jan 2003 13:52:51 -0800
Bugs item #668433, was opened at 2003-01-15 07:23
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=668433&group_id=5470
Category: Python Interpreter Core
Group: Python 2.3
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Walter Dörwald (doerwalter)
Assigned to: Guido van Rossum (gvanrossum)
>Summary: Abort with "negative ref count"
Initial Comment:
Python 2.3a1 and the current CVS version abort with the
following error message when executing the attached
test script:
Fatal Python error:
D:\Python-current\dist\src\Objects\descrobject.c:10
object at 007C3208 has negative ref count -1
This happens only in the debug build, both on Linux
(with configure --enable-unicode=ucs4 --with-pydebug
and 2.3a1) and on Windows (with the debug build and
current CVS).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Guido van Rossum (gvanrossum)
Date: 2003-01-15 16:52
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=6380
Bah. Trashcan code. :-(
OK, I'll look at it.
When I have time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Neal Norwitz (nnorwitz)
Date: 2003-01-15 16:37
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=33168
8/6/2002 works without complaints, 8/8/2002 breaks, 8/7/2002
breaks with a different error message:
Objects/typeobject.c:466: subtype_dealloc: Assertion
`g->gc.gc_refs != (-2)' failed.
All dates are American, ie, August, 6-8. The change
corresponds to Object/typeobject.c:
8/6 - 2.165 works
8/7 - 2.166 assertion listed above
8/8 - 2.167 assertion in bug report (current)
Guido made all the changes, assigning to him. :-)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Neal Norwitz (nnorwitz)
Date: 2003-01-15 15:37
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=33168
I'm not running w/--enable-unicode=ucs4, but I still get the
problem. I've simplified the test, but only a little so far.
The problem did not affect 2.2.2, only 2.3.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Neal Norwitz (nnorwitz)
Date: 2003-01-15 10:04
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=33168
Walter, there's no file attached.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=668433&group_id=5470