[Python-bugs-list] [ python-Bugs-654846 ] datetime docs need review, LaTeX

[SourceForge.net]

Bugs item #654846, was opened at 2002-12-16 16:07
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=654846&group_id=5470

Category: Documentation
Group: Python 2.3
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Assigned to: A.M. Kuchling (akuchling)
Summary: datetime docs need review, LaTeX

Initial Comment:
The datetime sandbox contains a plain text file, 
docs.txt, with about 5,500 words of datetime 
documentation.  This needs review by someone other 
than me, and LaTeXification too.  Kill two birds with one 
tedious stone <wink>.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-03-03 23:19

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

Yup -- thanks, Andrew!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: A.M. Kuchling (akuchling)
Date: 2003-03-03 15:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=11375

The datetime docs now seem to be reasonably complete and 
correctly marked up, so I'm closing this bug.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2002-12-17 23:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

Outstanding -- thanks, Andrew!  I burned too many candles 
at both ends while scrambling to finish the code, and I'm 
sure parts of the docs make no sense.  Feel free to bug me 
in email about the incomprehensible parts.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: A.M. Kuchling (akuchling)
Date: 2002-12-17 13:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=11375

I'm volunteering for this -- I need to write a whatsnew section on datetime anyway.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=654846&group_id=5470