[Python-bugs-list] [ python-Bugs-832799 ] Please link modules with
shared lib
SourceForge.net
noreply at sourceforge.net
Fri Oct 31 07:22:55 EST 2003
Bugs item #832799, was opened at 2003-10-29 20:36
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by benson_basis
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=832799&group_id=5470
Category: Build
Group: Python 2.3
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: benson margulies (benson_basis)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Please link modules with shared lib
Initial Comment:
We've been working with libraries that are loaded with
dlopen (on Linux and Solaris, the land of ELF) and
which, in turn, use the embedded python interpreter.
Due to the behavior of the dynamic linker, this would
work much better if modules were, by default, linked
with -lpython2.3 instead of just left with hanging
undefined symbols. Here's why.
The main executable isn't linked with python, and none
of it's direct dependents are. So, the python symbols
aren't in the global namespace.
The dlopened library is linked with python. However,
when the dlopened library dlopens the modules, the
linux linker is not clever enough to allow the second-
order library to use symbols from its parent. (Solaris
has such a feature, but not linux). So, one has to
manually dlopen the python library with RTLD_GLOBAL
to make it work.
If each module had a NEED for the python lib (via -l at
linktime), all this would just work.
I've got some local patches to build_ext.py for this
purpose, but it would be nice to have official support.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: benson margulies (benson_basis)
Date: 2003-10-31 07:22
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=876734
To turn my patches into things that anyone else would want,
I need to know what to put in the -L that will be required. At
the time we're building the main python distro, that's
straightforward. When a user builds an individual module, is
there a sensible path relative to PYTHONHOME I can use?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Martin v. Löwis (loewis)
Date: 2003-10-31 05:05
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=21627
Please do provide patches. Take into account that modules
may be built either with distutils, or through Modules/Setup.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=832799&group_id=5470
More information about the Python-bugs-list
mailing list