[Python-bugs-list] [ python-Bugs-812007 ] Wrong symbol for fsync in 2.3.1

[SourceForge.net]

Bugs item #812007, was opened at 2003-09-24 15:01
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by montanaro
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=812007&group_id=5470

Category: Build
Group: Python 2.3
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Matthew Cowles (mdcowles)
>Assigned to: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Summary: Wrong symbol for fsync in 2.3.1

Initial Comment:
In 2.3.1, pyconfig.h defines HAVE_SYNC if fsync is present:



/* Define if you have the 'fsync' function. */

#define HAVE_SYNC 1



but posixmodule.c looks for HAVE_FSYNC



#ifdef HAVE_FSYNC

PyDoc_STRVAR(posix_fsync__doc__,

"fsync(fildes)\n\n\



I expect that that's a typo in configure.in.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Date: 2003-09-25 10:12

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=44345

Fixed in:

   pyconfig.h.in 1.86

   configure.in 1.436

   configure 1.425



will backport



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Skip Montanaro (montanaro)
Date: 2003-09-25 07:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=44345

I have 2.57.  I can take care of it.





----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Michael Hudson (mwh)
Date: 2003-09-25 05:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6656

I can answer that: yes.



I assume this is a simple typo in configure.in, but if we're

using autconf 2.57 now, I'll need to install that before

checking the fix in...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Michael Hudson (mwh)
Date: 2003-09-25 04:55

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6656

Is this changed since 2.3?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=812007&group_id=5470