[ python-Bugs-973507 ] sys.stdout problems with pythonw.exe

SourceForge.net noreply at sourceforge.net
Thu Dec 23 16:19:57 CET 2004


Bugs item #973507, was opened at 2004-06-15 22:34
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by pfremy
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=973507&group_id=5470

Category: Python Interpreter Core
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Manlio Perillo (manlioperillo)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: sys.stdout problems with pythonw.exe

Initial Comment:
>>> sys.version
'2.3.3 (#51, Dec 18 2003, 20:22:39) [MSC v.1200 32 bit
(Intel)]'
>>> sys.platform
'win32'
>>> sys.getwindowsversion()
(5, 1, 2600, 2, '')


Hi.
I have written this script for reproducing the bug:



import sys

class teeIO:
    def __init__(self, *files):
        self.__files = files

    def write(self, str):
        for i in self.__files:
            print >> trace, 'writing on %s: %s' % (i, str)
            i.write(str)

        print >> trace, '-' * 70



def tee(*files):
    return teeIO(*files)


log = file('log.txt', 'w')
err = file('err.txt', 'w')
trace = file('trace.txt', 'w')

sys.stdout = tee(log, sys.__stdout__)
sys.stderr = tee(err, sys.__stderr__)

def write(n, width):
    sys.stdout.write('x' * width)
    if n == 1: return

    write(n - 1, width)
    
try:
    1/0
except:
    write(1, 4096)



[output from err.log]
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "sys.py", line 36, in ?
    write(1, 4096)
  File "sys.py", line 28, in write
    sys.stdout.write('x' * width)
  File "sys.py", line 10, in write
    i.write(str)
IOError: [Errno 9] Bad file descriptor




TeeIO is needed for actually read the program output,
but I don't know if the problem is due to teeIO.

The same problem is present for stderr, as can be seen
by swapping sys.__stdout__ and sys.__stderr__.

As I can see, 4096 is the buffer size for sys.stdout/err.
The problem is the same if the data is written in
chunks, ad example: write(2, 4096/2).

The bug isn't present if I use python.exe or if I write
less than 4096 bytes.


Thanks and regards   Manlio Perillo


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Philippe Fremy (pfremy)
Date: 2004-12-23 16:19

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=233844

Manlio, thanks a lot for the tip. I ran into the same
problem (a program that can both be used with python.exe and
pythonw.exe). I will apply your fix.

I think that the fix should be applied somehow to
pythonw.exe, so that it does something more understandable
to the user.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Manlio Perillo (manlioperillo)
Date: 2004-06-20 15:39

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=1054957

Thanks for sys.executable and 'nul' hints!

I only want to add two notes:

1) isrealfile(file('nul')) -> True

So 'nul' has a 'real' implementation

2) sys.executables isn't very useful for me, since I can do:
    pythonw ascript.py > afile

In this case sys.stdout is a 'real file', so I don't want to
redirect it to a null device.


In all cases, isrealfile work as I want.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2004-06-20 05:13

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

Just noting that "the usual" way to determine whether you're 
running under pythonw is to see whether

sys.executable.endswith("pythonw.exe")

The usual way to get a do-nothing file object on Windows is 
to open the special (to Windows) file named "nul" (that's akin 
to opening the special file /dev/null on Unixish boxes).

Note that file('nul').fileno() does return a handle on Windows, 
despite that it's not a file in the filesystem.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Manlio Perillo (manlioperillo)
Date: 2004-06-18 18:42

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=1054957

I have found a very simple patch.

First I have implemented this function:


import os

def isrealfile(file):
    """
    Test if file is on the os filesystem
    """
    
    if not hasattr(file, 'fileno'): return False

    try: tmp = os.dup(file.fileno())
    except: return False
    else: os.close(tmp); return True


Microsoft implementation of stdout/err/in when no console is
created (and when no pipes are used) actually are not 'real'
files.

Then I have added the following code in sitecustomize.py:


import sys

class NullStream:
    """
    A file like class that writes nothing
    """
    def close(self): pass
    def flush(self): pass
    def write(self, str): pass
    def writelines(self, sequence): pass

if not isrealfile(sys.__stdout__): 
   sys.stdout = NullStream()

if not isrealfile(sys.__stderr__):
   sys.stderr = NullStream()



I have tested the code only on Windows XP Pro.


P.S.
isrealfile could be added in os module.



Regards   Manlio Perillo

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Manlio Perillo (manlioperillo)
Date: 2004-06-16 19:05

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=1054957

The problem with this bug is that I have a script that can
be executed both with python.exe that with pythonw.exe!
How can I know if stdout is connected to a console?

I think a 'patch' would be to replace sys.stdout/err with a
null stream instead of using windows stdout/err implementation.
If fileno can't be implemented, it should not be a problem.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2004-06-16 01:09

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

Ya, this is well known, although it may not be documented.  
pythonw's purpose in life is *not* to create (or inherit) a 
console window (a "DOS box").  Therefore stdin, stdout, and 
stderr aren't attached to anything usable.  Microsoft's C 
runtime seems to attach them to buffers that aren't 
connected to anything, so they complain if you ever exceed 
the buffer size.

The short course is that stdin, stdout and stderr are useless 
in programs without a console window, so you shouldn't use 
them.  Or you should you install your own file-like objects, 
and make them do something useful to you.

I think it would be helpful if pythonw did something fancier 
(e.g., pop up a window containing attempted output), but 
that's in new-feature terrority, and nobody has contributed 
code for it anyway.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=973507&group_id=5470


More information about the Python-bugs-list mailing list