[ python-Bugs-1355842 ] Incorrect Decimal-float behavior for += and *=

SourceForge.net noreply at sourceforge.net
Fri Dec 2 07:17:32 CET 2005


Bugs item #1355842, was opened at 2005-11-13 11:17
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by connelly
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=1355842&group_id=5470

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: Python Library
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Connelly (connelly)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Incorrect Decimal-float behavior for += and *=

Initial Comment:
The += and *= operators have strange behavior when the
LHS is a Decimal and the RHS is a float (as of
2005-11-13 CVS decimal.py).

Example:

>>> d = Decimal('1.02')
>>> d += 2.1
>>> d
NotImplemented

A blatant violation of "Errors should never pass silently."

Also, a bad error description is produced for the *=
operator:

>>> d = Decimal('1.02')
>>> d *= 2.9
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
TypeError: can't multiply sequence by non-int


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Connelly (connelly)
Date: 2005-12-02 06:17

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=1039782

The += and *= operations also give the same strange behavior
when the LHS is a Decimal and the RHS is str or unicode:

>>> d = Decimal("1.0")
>>> d += "5"
>>> d
NotImplemented

>>> d = Decimal("1.0")
>>> d *= "1.0"
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
TypeError: can't multiply sequence by non-int


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Neal Norwitz (nnorwitz)
Date: 2005-11-14 04:43

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=33168

Hmmm.  __add__ returns NotImplemented which works with
classic classes, but not new-style classes.  I wonder if
NotImplementedError is supposed to be raised for new-style
classes.  

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=1355842&group_id=5470


More information about the Python-bugs-list mailing list