[ python-Bugs-1289118 ] timedelta multiply and divide by floating point
SourceForge.net
noreply at sourceforge.net
Thu Sep 15 23:04:28 CEST 2005
Bugs item #1289118, was opened at 2005-09-12 17:41
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=1289118&group_id=5470
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: Python Library
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Daniel Stutzbach (agthorr)
>Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: timedelta multiply and divide by floating point
Initial Comment:
In python 2.4.1, the datetime.timedelta type allows for
the multiplication and division by integers. However,
it raises a TypeError for multiplication or division by
floating point numbers. This is a counterintutive
restriction and I can't think of any good reason for it.
For example:
>>> import datetime
>>> datetime.timedelta(minutes=5)/2
datetime.timedelta(0, 150)
>>> datetime.timedelta(minutes=5)*0.5
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for *:
'datetime.timedelta' and 'float'
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2005-09-15 17:04
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=31435
timedelta arithmetic is 100% portable now, and wholly
explainable in terms of universally understood integer
arithmetic. Throw floats into it, and that's lost.
That said, I don't have a strong objection to complicating the
implementation if there _are_ strong use cases. The OP's
example isn't "a use case": it's not worth anything to let
someone multiply a timedelta by 0.5 instead of dividing by 2.
I don't have a use case to offer in its place (never felt a need
here).
If someone wants to work on it, note that a timedelta can
contain more than 53 bits of information, so, e.g., trying to
represent a timedelta as an IEEE double-precision number of
microseconds can lose information. This makes a high-
qualty "computed as if to infinite precision with one rounding
at the end" implementation of mixed datetime/float arithmetic
tricky to do right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Michael Chermside (mcherm)
Date: 2005-09-15 12:03
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=99874
I, too, would like to know what Tim thinks, but for what it's
worth (not much) I find Daniel's point fairly convincing...
multiplication by floats is an operation that makes sense, has
only one possible obvious meaning, and is not particularly
likely to cause errors (the way multiplying Decimal's with
floats does). So IF it's easy to implement, I say go for it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Raymond Hettinger (rhettinger)
Date: 2005-09-13 00:11
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=80475
Tim, do you prefer the current behavior?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=1289118&group_id=5470
More information about the Python-bugs-list
mailing list