[ python-Bugs-1527705 ] optparse should support arbitrary number of arguments

[SourceForge.net]

Bugs item #1527705, was opened at 2006-07-24 17:33
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by riteshsarraf
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=1527705&group_id=5470

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: Python Library
Group: Feature Request
>Status: Open
>Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ritesh Raj Sarraf (riteshsarraf)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: optparse should support arbitrary number of arguments

Initial Comment:
Currently, the number of arguments an option 
can/should have, needs be defined.

This is done using "nagrs".

parser.add_option("", "--my-option", nargs=3)

The problem is that at times it isn't predictable how 
many arguments you'll be receiving.

I request the implementation of this feature in 
optparse, where the following could be possible.

parser.add_option("", "--my-option", nargs=*)

Thanks,
Ritesh

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Ritesh Raj Sarraf (riteshsarraf)
Date: 2006-07-24 18:51

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=382018

Can you please go through the following link and give your 
comments ?

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/browse_thre
ad/thread/277522927334b8d8

I feel its a valid feature request.

Ritesh

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Georg Brandl (gbrandl)
Date: 2006-07-24 18:27

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=849994

I don't know of any program that uses command line switches
with a variable number of args, partly because you then
cannot distinguish between option arguments and normal
arguments.

I you still need this, you can implement a custom callback,
I think.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=1527705&group_id=5470