[ python-Bugs-1708362 ] Why not sequential?

SourceForge.net noreply at sourceforge.net
Thu Apr 26 22:38:42 CEST 2007


Bugs item #1708362, was opened at 2007-04-26 22:38
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=1708362&group_id=5470

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Lucas Malor (lucas_malor)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Why not sequential?

Initial Comment:
In my opinion it's not complicated, it's convoluted. I must use two object to handle one data stream.

Furthermore it's a waste of resources. I must copy data to another object. Luckily in my script I download and handle only little files. But what if a python program must handle big files?

If seek() can't be used (an except is raised), urllib could use a sequential access method.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=1708362&group_id=5470


More information about the Python-bugs-list mailing list