[issue1487] PEP 366 implementation
report at bugs.python.org
Sun Dec 2 15:01:48 CET 2007
Nick Coghlan added the comment:
Posted v2 of the patch, which fixes the problem Guido noted, and
improved the tests to make sure __package__ is being set correctly.
There's also now an explicit test for using -m on a module inside a
package (which proved harder to write than I expected - it isn't easy to
fiddle with sys.path when the subprocess is running python with the -E
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file8852/pep_366_v2.diff
Tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
More information about the Python-bugs-list