[issue2292] Missing *-unpacking generalizations

Guido van Rossum report at bugs.python.org
Mon Apr 7 21:07:51 CEST 2008


Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> added the comment:

>  Do I understand correctly that non-starred arguments are packed into
>  intermediate tuples/sets in the presence of starred arguments so that
>  {a,b,*c,d,e} is equivalent to {*{a,b},*c,*{d,e}}? This should not be a
>  problem for tuples, but with sets, it means that {a,b,c} may behave
>  subtly differently from {a,*(b,c)}.

Can you show an example where this would be different?

__________________________________
Tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2292>
__________________________________


More information about the Python-bugs-list mailing list