[issue1678380] 0.0 and -0.0 identified, with surprising results

[Mark Dickinson]

Mark Dickinson added the comment:

Bug identifying 0j and -0j fixed for Python 2.6 in revision 60483.

Martin, can this be backported to 2.5.2?  I'll assume not, unless I hear
otherwise from you.

----------
status: open -> pending

_____________________________________
Tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1678380>
_____________________________________