[issue2844] int() lies about base parameter

[Alexander Belopolsky]

Alexander Belopolsky <belopolsky at users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:

> 10 would *not* do the trick:

You are right.  I guess something like issue2844-1.diff will be
necessary.  I am not sure it is worth the trouble, though.  Maybe just
change -909 to -MAX_INT?  Jakub, how did you discover this in the first
place?

Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10317/issue2844-1.diff

__________________________________
Tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2844>
__________________________________