[issue2844] int() lies about base parameter

[Martin v. Löwis]

Martin v. Löwis <martin at v.loewis.de> added the comment:

I don't see the problem at all. The -909 value is an implementation
artefact, and the submitter probably wouldn't have known it existed
without reading the source code. Perhaps we should change it to
something different every Python release just to denote that it is
deliberately undocumented.

Closing as "won't fix".

----------
nosy: +loewis
resolution:  -> wont fix
status: open -> closed

__________________________________
Tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2844>
__________________________________